This reader has made
some good points. For example, he drew attention to a quote in my piece,
from Sydney Morning Herald commentator
Paul
Sheehan:
The curse of dogma has
touched
Australia only lightly and thus the curse of political instability has
passed us by. We have never been afflicted with the extremes of corporatism
or communism or any of the isms in between. We don't trust God much, either.
Australia's place as one of the world's most durable, stable, prosperous and
open democracies has been built by the victory of pragmatism over ideology.
And he commented:
Maybe I'm missing
something here, but I fail to see the point of a Christian (apparently
favourably) quoting a commentator who claims that
Australia's
lack of political instability is due (in part) to
not trusting God much! And I don't agree with him on a lack
of dogma; Australia has plenty of atheistic dogma to go around.
Yes, fair point. He
also noted that I had
quoted the BBC,
concerning comments by Rev. Nile on the wearing of traditional dress by
Muslim women in
Australia,
and he wrote:
Why a Christian would
quote a secular media report on what another Christian said when the
original is available is beyond me. The media cannot be trusted to be
accurate in a lot of what they publish, and as they are mostly
anti-Christian, this is particularly true with reporting Christian matters.
I agree. But what has
really set me thinking was the reader’s final comment:
Did you privately
contact Fred Nile to discuss your concerns before publicly berating him? If
not, would you like to be publicly criticised by a fellow Christian without
having the opportunity to discuss the issue privately?
No, I didn’t contact
him. Should I have? Should we Christians consult our Christian brothers and
sisters before publicly berating them?
I have felt discomfort
when I have seen Christians use the secular media to attack fellow
Christians. For example, why did Rev Tim Costello feel the need to write an
article for the Sydney Morning Herald attacking Archbishop Peter
Jensen and his brother Rev Phillip Jensen?
Another example: Peter
Stokes of the Salt Shakers
ministry often criticises “liberal” Christians in his newsletter. But why
did he do so in a letter (not online) to The Age newspaper? Here’s a
couple of bits of what he wrote:
Why is that so many
Christians want to be nicer than Jesus?...It’s time for many Christians,
including some ‘church leaders’, to find the true meaning of justice.
Indeed, Fred Nile
isn’t the only Christian leader I’ve berated on this website. Another is
Archbishop Peter
Carnley, whom I didn’t contact either.
But these are two
Christian leaders who have very consciously thrust themselves into the
public arena. Few Australian Christians can have issued more media releases
than Fred Nile. Perhaps
only
Peter Carnley comes close.
So I don’t feel
uncomfortable about criticising their public pronouncements, here on my
website (which attracts just a minuscule fraction of the numbers of readers
who are exposed to these leaders’ press releases in the mainstream media).
Nevertheless, I’m
starting to think that as a matter of courtesy I should have consulted them.
What does anyone else think?
September 22nd, 2003